Shipping Wiki
Shipping Wiki

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

10 January 2025

6 January 2025

27 December 2024

11 December 2024

24 November 2024

22 November 2024

15 October 2024

3 October 2024

24 September 2024

  • curprev 00:5900:59, 24 September 2024Raelyx Message Wall contribs 35,642 bytes +181 Editing this bit as separating the CN characters makes no sense. Also making it clear that it can be used in a platonic and romantic sense, but it does convey the sense of closeness the word brings compare to another word for relationship. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

30 August 2024

28 August 2024

23 August 2024

21 August 2024

20 August 2024

  • curprev 17:2617:26, 20 August 2024Raelyx Message Wall contribs 34,335 bytes −690 Then by all means, add it to the Raturine page. That will do more benefit to their page than here. You’ve already shown that you had some biasness by your wording that you tried to erase earlier. If you view Aven as gay, no one is stopping you. But there is no need to keep that here when you clearly think that way. Instead, why not add more positive things then to the ships that view Aven as such? No need to keep adding it here. If they are interested in the other ships, they can go to that page Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 17:2217:22, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,025 bytes +690 And there's no need to exclude it either. You may not like it, but it's a very popular take on their ship and it only makes the page more nuanced and unbiased. No one is trying to convince you to stop shipping them or accept other people's headcanons, it's just an opinion like any other. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 17:0517:05, 20 August 2024Raelyx Message Wall contribs 34,335 bytes −690 Just because it’s allowed does not mean it has to be included. There is literally no reason to keep this. You can add this to other pages if other contributors keep it, but we like to collect and focus more on positive data here for this ship and had to hold back on being too biased with wording unlike other pages. If you don’t agree with some of the interpretations, you’re free to go to the other ship pages. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 16:5916:59, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,025 bytes +690 This is literally what the fanon section is for. It's where the fandom's opinions, headcanons, and everything else that isn't canon are written. Many ship pages contain opinions on why the ship is liked or disliked in the fandom, and that's okay, it doesn't go against the rules of the wiki. You can ask any admin and they'll tell you it's allowed because it's in the fanon. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 16:3616:36, 20 August 2024Luzcapri Message Wall contribs 34,335 bytes −690 "Even if you like AvenPaz, this edit is unnecessary considering its negative connotations against the ship. Maybe you mean well, but your edit will only drive new fans away thinking that they're wrong for enjoying the ship because of very popular HEADCANONS in the fandom that people like you continue to perpetuate. You may not perceive your edit as negative, but you should know that you're only doing harm in the perception of the ship that you claim to like when you insist on keeping an uneeded Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 16:2716:27, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,025 bytes +690 I'm not going to argue with you, I've already said many times that this is an objective assessment of the situation in the fandom and it has the right to be here, that's why the fanon section exists. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 16:1416:14, 20 August 2024Kopi lawak Message Wall contribs 34,335 bytes −690 blud, just admit it, you don't even like this ship and it's best that you leave this page, you had already admitted to be bias, just say that you're here to stir drama today Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 16:1016:10, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,025 bytes −6 Okay, I admit that this part was a little biased, but otherwise I can't say I'm wrong. Tags: Reverted Source edit
  • curprev 16:0216:02, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,031 bytes +696 Well then you should know that I like Avenpaz, and yet it is a very popular interpretation in the fandom, which I am not going to deny. I did not replace the entire text with "ewww, Aventurine is gay", did not portray their shippers as homophobes, but only described how the fandom sees them. The fact that you took this as negative is only a result of your perception. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 15:5215:52, 20 August 2024Kopi lawak Message Wall contribs 34,335 bytes −696 blud, take my advice and stop engaging in ship wars on a wiki page, you know, it's pretty obvious that you came here not for positivity, and i believe you yourself know about it before sticking your fingers into that keyboard. you know why your edit was removed-it came off as someone who doesn't even like it to begin with. your edit is a negative statement towards the ship and unlike other pages, you didn't attempt to justify it in your wording, don't you think it's a bit rude? Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 15:4915:49, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,031 bytes +697 The fanon section is for any opinions about the ship, in this case the opinion that Aventurine is gay coded is very popular. You can ignore it if you like, I'm not trying to make the ship look bad or convince others not to ship them, I'm just dryly describing the situation in the fandom. Tag: Undo
  • curprev 15:3215:32, 20 August 2024Raelyx Message Wall contribs 34,334 bytes −697 I don’t believe it’s written neutrally so the how it’s worded at the end. Peacocks has multiple meanings and the only Oscar Wilde reference I have seen was from an NPC that Aventurine said no to. This is not how the entirety of the fandom’s view. I see no point in adding in something negative about the ship when this whole page is meant to talk about the dynamic of the ship and why people ship it, not why people don’t. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 15:2815:28, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,031 bytes +697 This is how the ship is seen in the fandom and I see no point in denying it, that's what the fanon section is for. It's written as neutrally as possible and doesn't blame anyone for shipping them. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 14:4914:49, 20 August 2024Raelyx Message Wall contribs 34,334 bytes −697 I really don’t think this should be added as this would rather harm the ship than do any justice to why people ship it. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 14:4514:45, 20 August 2024EepyHoshi Message Wall contribs 35,031 bytes +697 No edit summary Tags: Reverted Source edit

15 August 2024

14 August 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)